Things that cause Bully to grind her teeth to stubs.

It's tough to take on an incumbent.  It's doubly tough when you lie.  It's triply tough when you're broke.  It's geometrically tougher when your positions are in direct opposition to the views held by the vast majority of the district you're trying to take over.

Caught in multiple, unnecessary and childish lies... busted in a bogus, false portrayal of a hard working representative of the people... a fringe-leftist so far out there that even her amateurish efforts to kowtow to the WEA were an abysmal failure... only to see this on this evening's democratian:

 

Here's Rep. Liz Pike with Rock Star Sen. Ann "Bridge Killer" Rivers.

The focus of the story?

The effort of Rep. Pike and Sen. Rivers to put together a bi-state, bipartisan effort to address our cross-river transportation issues... a transparent effort to actually act on behalf of the people instead of at the bidding of the downtown special interests who screwed up the CRC Scam so badly.

And earned media that Bully can't even dream of.

Likeability cannot be over-estimated in a political campaign.  Our Liz has it.

Bully, on the other hand, is possessed of that strident arrogance that's such a turn off.  With an ego matched only by her ignorance... both the size of, dare I say it... Bangladesh? 

Bully can't figure it out.  No money... no traction... no clue.

And it will get worse... without getting better.

Is ANYTHING about Bully real?

I and others have already documented her rather bizarre series of lies contained within her dem goat rope rant a few days back... but that got me to wondering: is ANYTHING about this woman real?

It started with the obviously fake premise that this woman... which no one has ever heard of... has almost 1200 obviously bogus "likes" on her campaign fiction page.  That's when I knew she was going to be as artificial and plastic as anyone could be, holding up a false façade to send an equally false effort to get anyone to believe anything she has to say.

Ask yourself: how did this executive job outsourcer manage to get over a thousand likes in 2 days?

She paid for them.

The equally abysmal candidate positioning himself to get flattened in the 18th has been making a nuisance of himself for months... and HE even got the WEA endorsement that seems to elude her since they rarely give it to obvious whack jobs.

Yet, he's only put together 213 or so.

In fact, take Bob Dingethal.... who, although floundering as much as the other two, IS, after all, a congressional candidate... has put together a paltry 771 likes.

So, how is it that Bully has 500 more?

And remember back in the 2012 cycle, how Stephony or one of those made such a huge deal over David Madore's "likes?"  Why the double standard?  Why the silence now?

Other than the obvious?

One of the biggest issues I've had with the democratian is their institutional double standard.

This is an example of that.

Bully STILL can't get the WEA endorsement... continues to beg.

Gee.  It's almost pathetic.

Maureen "Bully" Winningham is wishing against wish, hoping against hope that the WEA will endorse her like they did on the same day as his interview, Mussolini Mikey Briggs.

You KNOW it gripes her shorts that Mikey got the score while she got... bumpkis.

Must have been that great democrat goat rope speech of hers that sealed the deal.

That said, this little tidbit was on her campaign facebook page today: more idiocy.  (Bully's pandering really IS over the top.)

Brewster is one of the C3G2 neo-communists.  Never heard of the other one.

That said, the article in question is from... wait for it... a blog.

In short, she's putting her fellow union hacks on some sort of pedestal to get their support.  And clearly, the fact that she can't get a dime from any of the teachers around here pretty much shows they're smart enough to figure it out.

My take on teachers is pretty simple:  Don't like the pay, the benefits, the classroom size, the hours, the students, their parents, the facilities?

Then quit.  You won't be missed and you really should be pumping gas for a living instead of leaching off the taxpayers as much as you do.

But for God's sake... knock off your monumental whining,.  You're not all that special... it's a job you typically don't do all that well, and frankly, I'm sick of hearing you whine.

Bully gets sent a message by Speaker Chopp.

Like everyone else who both understands reality AND local politics, the democrats have acknowledged that neither of the M&M Twins, Mikey OR Maureen, stands a chance of winning in the 18th... not only this cycle, but perhaps forever.

That point was reinforced to Maureen over the past couple of days.

Mikey, who may have had a least a spark of hope that he might be able to do something in this election, given the kneepads he wore out that got him the WEA endorsement he's so proud of, must have felt the bottom of his political world drop out.

So, imagine how steamed Maureen got over this campaign kickoff thing?

Mikey's had a bad time with his campaign kick-off:  As I laid it out here once before, Mikey had set up a kick-off and NO ONE WANTED TO GO.

Originally, the date Maureen apparently had wanted was May 20.  And that's when she found out where she was on the democrat campaign food chain.

Here, let me allow the Twins to tell it in their own words:

An interesting change of events- I just read this announcement from Maureen Winningham as it came across Facebook.

"Hi all. In order to accommodate the Kick Off of my colleague, Re-Elect Monica Stonier, we are moving my Kick Off to May 12th, Monday. Same time, same restaurant. Monica worked to get Frank Chop to speak at her event and her race is a tough one. So we are all working together to move... things. Thanks to Mike Briggs for graciously understanding - his Kick Off is the Day after mine. I hope this does not cause any inconvenience for the folks in LD18! Please accept my apologies as it is Campaign Season and we all try to to[sic] together as good Democrats to help each other out.
Like."·

This was the first time I have heard of this time conflict. I have offered to allow Maureen to share my previously scheduled and published kickoff date of May 13- but have heard nothing back as of yet.

I am still looking to have my kickoff on, Tuesday, May 13. I will be confirming the destination but it will be in the Camas - Washougal area and in the early evening hours. I look forward to seeing many of my friends and supporters at this important event

Maureen, who's jimmies are getting rustled because each day, it seems she's NOT going to get the WEA endorsement Musso picked up so easily AND she's starting to realize the impacts of being the bully in the race, MUST understand what getting kicked to the curb like this means:  the message is clear.

To the Speaker, you're not even a statistic.

Precisely the same way the rest of us see you.

Of course, Rep. Stonier is no more Winningham's "colleague" than Bully is "normal."  In politics, there are two kinds of people: those who WANT to be elected and those who ARE elected.  And because Bully will NEVER be elected, it's rather presumptuous, not to mention inaccurate, to refer to Rep. Stonier as a "colleague."  But clearly, Bully's ego knows no bounds.

That said, even Bully must know the symbolism: the Speaker of the House will show up for Stonier's kickoff, and as a result, Winningham MUST move hers.

Hey, Mikey... here's an idea: why not offer her the failed date of April 8?  It's still available after HE screwed it up... and she might just take it!

Looks like the WEA doesn't like Bully all that much.

Mike Briggs is positively giddy that the WEA gave him an endorsement.  I'm hearing that Bully was interviewed the same day... and yet... nothing from Bully about getting the endorsement which, by all appearances, was a piece of cake for Briggs.

Gotta wonder: why is that?

How sad is it that the WEA saw Briggs as a slam dunk, but seem to be not so confident in Bully's limited abilities?

Wonder what they say that Bully doesn't?

Maybe they looked at her moronic speech at the democrat goat rope a few days back.

I sure sent it to enough of them.

You know... just trying to help out and all.

I know Bully is going to be seeing it... a lot.

 

How much can one candidate lie in 7 minutes?

Memo for Bully:

Update on non-viable campaigns - Still looks abysmal for local leftist fund raising.

Local leftists are in a bad way if they're a challenge candidate.

Everyone from Dingethal to the M&M Twins are scraping the bottom of the barrel... not only on their political positions and their long-established cowardice in failing to answer questions, but in everything from their facebook page views to their inability to raise money.

Posts below detail the abysmal, disheartening figures for Dingethal, who, no matter what his messaging may be, lacks the wherewithal to put it out there and seems to lack any understanding of how powerful social media can actually be.

The M&M Twins are failing at the same time in every way.

Briggs has been an announced candidate since January 21.

In all that time, he has raised a total of $2075 over about 13 weeks... almost half of that from one democrat front group, IBEW 48.  And frankly,  $160 a week between now and the primary won't even pay for his campaign's wake.

Bully Winningham hasn't done a lot better.

While she's raised $5700, she's only raised $1150 from our entire STATE... and the biggest chunk of that appears to be coming from family members... $3800 from Rhode Island.

Do they get it yet?

And these horrific numbers are in an uncontested primary situation.

By now, then non-incumbent Ann Rivers in a 6 way primary had put together $21,140.

In the prior 3 weeks, she had raised around $6000.

Neither of the M&M Twins can come close.

Election night in November stands to be an absolute hoot.  Right now... I actually pity these three, stuffed into the democrat meat grinder in a place they do not comprehend in an effort that is going to end very, very badly for them.

Don't misunderstand me: I expect they'll get a few more dollars from the fringe-left groups like the IBEW; after all, those groups have their fangs sunk deep into the rank and file's jugular so wasting a few thousand dollars is nothing for them... and besides, it keeps up appearances.

This is even painful to look at. 

Welcome to the Bully Winningham Watch Blog!

As a constituent of the 18th Legislative District, I am naturally concerned about who is representing us in the legislature.

We have two stellar members there right now: Sen. Ann "Bridge Killer" Rivers and Rep. Liz Pike.  Both are stellar in their job, hard working at this allegedly "part time" gig that seems to take up most of the day.

Both reflect the views and values of the majority of the people of this district.  Both have fought hard and ultimately, successfully to kill the many-headed snake known as the CRC Scam.  Both are open and available to their constituents for dealing with the issues confronting us all.

Both also clobbered their opponents in the last cycle, massacring them with a 63% or better vote count in the last election.

So, what do the democrats do about that in the race for the 18th District House seat?

They unleash a lying thug named Maureen Winningham.

Watch her in action at the local democrat goat rope a view days back.



The screen over is provided by the inestimable Lew Waters, YouTube wizard extraordinaire.

The problem we've got here is that this video lays out in detail what this woman really is.

She's strident, delusional and completely out of touch with this district.

She's unconcerned with the fact that every single precinct in the entirety of this district voted against the loot rail scam just last November, simultaneously giving Rep. Pike credit for helping to kill it.

She's also, obviously, desperate; recognizing that she's got zero traction and no local support.  So she has to do what leftists typically do: she lies.  She lied in the video... more than once.... when she didn't even have to:

Yes, for example, Bangladore, India DOES have stop lights:
 

And no, Bangalore was NOT a "sleepy little retirement town of 100,000."  Ten years ago or SEVENTY years ago.

It was a "sleepy little retirement town with roughly the population of the entire state of Washington 10 years ago (Actually, 13 years ago.)

Further, as the census figures show, she even lied when she claimed, falsely, that people are "moving away from Bangalore because it's too tough to live there."

A population growth rate of 65% over the prior decade... and "people are moving away?"

Population Growth
Census	Pop.		%±
1941	406,760		—
1951	778,977		91.5%
1961	1,207,000		54.9%
1971	1,654,000		37.0%
1981	2,922,000		76.7%
1991	4,130,000		41.3%
2001	5,101,000		23.5%
2011	8,425,970		65.2%
Source: Census of India[133][134

So, why does this embittered partisan have to lie?

Why did she lie about Liz's voting record?

Why doesn't what the people of this district want matter to her?

And THIS woman is going to call OUR Liz a "bully?"

Well, there's a bully in this race all right: a clueless, fringe-leftist union hack of a partisan who with this one video shows herself to be better suited to represent the Vancouver Soviet then us hicks out here in rural Clark County.

Why does she have to make this stuff up?  And if she's going to lie about crap like this... then what else has she lied to us about?

And what else WILL she lie to us about?

And when this is all over... she is going to not only be defeated this November... she is going to be CRUSHED.

And I am going to do everything I can to make sure that happens, because I don't want this woman around ANYWHERE in my government.

Much more to come.  Stay tuned!