Will Bully Winningham ever learn?

So, she's babbling about the democratian's cheap shot on Liz:

All the while neglecting to mention that part of her "executive" duties involve providing training... for the 50,000 jobs her employer has outsourced. But here's a little snippet this mental case doesn't want you to see... and naturally the democratian won't mention it... but what was Bully Loserham's response to the question "...for McCleary, do we need to raise taxes?"                                                                                

 

Bully, being as psychopathic as she is, fails to answer. The democratian, BEING the hypocrites they are, apply one standard to Our Liz, and a completely different standard to the narcissistic liar running against her. Odd, isn't it?

And man, it didn't take long for Dake to join the democratian hate train, did it?

I was struck by one of the many stupid things Maureen "Bully" Winningham had to say...

... in yesterday's Columbian coffee klatch.

Among other things, in response to the question (Which in reality, she failed to answer) "... for (the) McLeary (decision) do we need to raise more taxes?"

At around the 6:55 mark, this simple idiot actually said this:

"And my opponent's, ummm, saying, ahhh,  ‘less government, lower taxes, more freedom’ just doesn’t cut it in this economic climate."

(If necessary, click play icon twice.)

So, this fringe-left nutbag actually believes that we should have MORE government, HIGHER taxes and LESS freedom?

Stalinists rejoice.  You've got one of your own running as a democrat in the 18th District.

Stand by for more later.

Bully Winningham:relies on the local hate group for support.

Given her pathetic showing and subsequent lies about how badly she did in the primary election... when combined with her pathological liar persona, I suppose it's not surprising the Maureen "Bully" Loserham would come crawling to the fringe left hate site, C3G2, for support.

In response to one of the more moronic comments spewed by one of the haters over there, Bully wrote this tripe:

Since Rep. Pike voted AGAINST this legalized coup attempt, why would anyone "wonder" where she'd stand on it?

Here's Bully's blather in a more readable form:

How sad is it that Bully has to set up links to the newspaper to try and get at least SOME support through LTE's?



And how sad is it that she has to try and scam help from the hate site to make that happen?

After getting clobbered in the primary, the M&M Twins are strangely silent.

Look, no one believed either of these clowns had a chance.  One is a pathological liar, and the other has the personality of a snake.

Both are fringe-left nutbags, suitable for "representing" the neo-communist 49th District, neither have a hope in hell of winning this election.  Neither ever did have such a hope, as I have pointed out repeatedly.

This is the problem when fringe-left nutburgers run your local party.

They're the hammer, and every one of their candidates has to be a nail.

If the democrats ever hope to win in rural Clark County, they can't keep running cardboard cutouts of Mike Heywood and Jim Moeller.

If the democrats ever hope to win, they can't keep running candidates who lie at the drop of a hat.

If they ever intend to have a realistic chance of winning around here, they have to begin to do something they appear to be genetically incapable OF doing: they have to accept reality.

Instead, they keep yammering away for the CRC as if all of those votes actually SUPPORTED it instead of opposed it.

They have to stop whining.  They have to stop supporting that idiotic charter that is going to get crushed, as those running this bizarre effort already know it will.

If they ever HOPE to win, they must disavow the idiocy of Steve "I only speak for Steve" Stuart, who, like so many democrats, doesn't give a DAMN what the people want when those people have a different agenda.



That is why Mussolini Mikey got clobbered in the primary.

That is why Bully Loserham got crushed in the primary... and even had to lie about THAT.

Like all of the other democrat road kill in the 18th, these two clowns will soon become footnotes on an election returns pdf.  And it can't happen a moment too soon.

So, is Heather Stuart going to refund Bully Winningham's money?

As of 24 July, according to the PDC's, Heather Stuart (Wife of Steve "I only speak for Steve" Stuart) has picked up $3000 from Bully Loserham's campaign.

And for that... Bully got 42%.

How can Heather accept that kind of money with a straight face?  How could any consultant?

Why would Heather even take the gig, knowing there was precisely NO WAY Bully could win in the 18th, and, apparently, being unable to control Bully's penchant for lying.

A lot.

Sio, Heather, be a pal and give Maureen her money back.  Because she's certainly wasting it with you.

Bully Loserham continues to hit the skids.

Rep. Liz Pike (R-Camas) continues to extend her lead over Maureen "Bully" Winningham who was positively giddy election night when she lied yet again about the primary outcome.

Bully, who has got to be embarrassed by her pathetic performance, felt compelled to lie about the percentage of the vote she actually picked up on election night (43.59) instead rounding that number up to 44, and then goes on to lie to call her incredibly weak failure "unprecedented" in the 18th... when many others had exceeded her lame effort.

And the news just keeps getting worse as she sinks into her well-deserved anonymity: her percentage of the vote continues to fall and has now shattered the glass ceiling of the 43rd percentile... down to 42.28... and likely to drop down to 41 before it's all over.

Bully, you lost any hope of winning by starting your campaign with a series of inexplicable lies and personal attacks... not that you, as a fringe-left nut burger, stood a chance anyway in this conservative district.

And soon, you'll be gone, like all of the other leftist road kill in the 18.  And we'll all be much better off for it.

The difference between a winner (Pike) and a loser (Winningham)

From their respective campaign web sites.

From Bully's page:

Her lies about this result being "unprecedented" notwithstanding, notice the difference in the "likes?"

This from a woman who scammed in the first two days her facebook page was up?






15?

Seriously?

That's just one of the differences between a winner... and a loser.