After getting clobbered in the primary, the M&M Twins are strangely silent.

Look, no one believed either of these clowns had a chance.  One is a pathological liar, and the other has the personality of a snake.

Both are fringe-left nutbags, suitable for "representing" the neo-communist 49th District, neither have a hope in hell of winning this election.  Neither ever did have such a hope, as I have pointed out repeatedly.

This is the problem when fringe-left nutburgers run your local party.

They're the hammer, and every one of their candidates has to be a nail.

If the democrats ever hope to win in rural Clark County, they can't keep running cardboard cutouts of Mike Heywood and Jim Moeller.

If the democrats ever hope to win, they can't keep running candidates who lie at the drop of a hat.

If they ever intend to have a realistic chance of winning around here, they have to begin to do something they appear to be genetically incapable OF doing: they have to accept reality.

Instead, they keep yammering away for the CRC as if all of those votes actually SUPPORTED it instead of opposed it.

They have to stop whining.  They have to stop supporting that idiotic charter that is going to get crushed, as those running this bizarre effort already know it will.

If they ever HOPE to win, they must disavow the idiocy of Steve "I only speak for Steve" Stuart, who, like so many democrats, doesn't give a DAMN what the people want when those people have a different agenda.



That is why Mussolini Mikey got clobbered in the primary.

That is why Bully Loserham got crushed in the primary... and even had to lie about THAT.

Like all of the other democrat road kill in the 18th, these two clowns will soon become footnotes on an election returns pdf.  And it can't happen a moment too soon.

So, is Heather Stuart going to refund Bully Winningham's money?

As of 24 July, according to the PDC's, Heather Stuart (Wife of Steve "I only speak for Steve" Stuart) has picked up $3000 from Bully Loserham's campaign.

And for that... Bully got 42%.

How can Heather accept that kind of money with a straight face?  How could any consultant?

Why would Heather even take the gig, knowing there was precisely NO WAY Bully could win in the 18th, and, apparently, being unable to control Bully's penchant for lying.

A lot.

Sio, Heather, be a pal and give Maureen her money back.  Because she's certainly wasting it with you.

Bully Loserham continues to hit the skids.

Rep. Liz Pike (R-Camas) continues to extend her lead over Maureen "Bully" Winningham who was positively giddy election night when she lied yet again about the primary outcome.

Bully, who has got to be embarrassed by her pathetic performance, felt compelled to lie about the percentage of the vote she actually picked up on election night (43.59) instead rounding that number up to 44, and then goes on to lie to call her incredibly weak failure "unprecedented" in the 18th... when many others had exceeded her lame effort.

And the news just keeps getting worse as she sinks into her well-deserved anonymity: her percentage of the vote continues to fall and has now shattered the glass ceiling of the 43rd percentile... down to 42.28... and likely to drop down to 41 before it's all over.

Bully, you lost any hope of winning by starting your campaign with a series of inexplicable lies and personal attacks... not that you, as a fringe-left nut burger, stood a chance anyway in this conservative district.

And soon, you'll be gone, like all of the other leftist road kill in the 18.  And we'll all be much better off for it.

The difference between a winner (Pike) and a loser (Winningham)

From their respective campaign web sites.

From Bully's page:

Her lies about this result being "unprecedented" notwithstanding, notice the difference in the "likes?"

This from a woman who scammed in the first two days her facebook page was up?






15?

Seriously?

That's just one of the differences between a winner... and a loser.

Bully Loserham can't even tell the truth about how many votes she scammed.

It's a problem when you're a pathological liar and you're running for office.

First of all, I appreciate the rounding abilities of Maureen Winningham, also known as Bully Loserham.

Her percentage of the vote at this point is as high as it's going to get: 43.59%, which is not, of course, the 44% she claims.  Further, by the time the votes are counted, the late breaking right vote ought to drop her somewhere below 42%.

Next, I appreciate her desire to lie even when doing so makes no sense and gains her no advantage.

Like this beaut: like most of her "facts," Bully lied about the numbers being "unprecedented for this district."

In 2008, Jon Haugen picked up 44.87% of the vote against Joe Zarelli in the Primary.

In 2006, Jonathan Fant Picked up 48.59% (8184) vs Richard Curtis 51.61% (8693) and Julie McChord picked up 49.39% (8483) against Ed Orcutt at 50.61% (8693).  There are, of course, several others.

This, then, is right up there with Bully's lies about Bangalore, about Our Liz and now... about her own election results.

All lies that show a pattern of lying.  All unnecessary lies that serve to build her up while, in fact, tearing her down.

And all lies that will show the same outcome: defeat for her.  Thank God.

There really is no lie that psychotic Winningham won't tell. The question is, why?

Legendary for lying essentially every time her lips moved at the democrat goat rope a few months back, Bully Loserham's no-traction egomaniacal lie of a campaign continues at the crippled rate it can go, given her lack of money and support.

Starting with the fact unions overlook: that this psycho-dem enslaves thousands of people working at jobs Intel has outsourced (50,000 or so, if memory serves... odd that labor hasn't been concerned about that... but then, leftist political bigotry is rather situational.) to her incessant lies about our Liz Pike, this witch has shown herself utterly unfit for elective office anywhere... to anything.

Of all of the videos Bully points out, she never points to this one:  (I wonder why?)

The lies of Maureen Winningham:

Bully

Winningham has lied in every conceivable way about every possible position our Liz takes or has taken.

These lies include:

While my opponent is against regulation at all costs

The proposed oil terminal at the Port of Vancouver is an example of an unnecessary threat to our community. 

My opponent is against all regulations that would stop firearms from falling into the wrong hands

Her irrational refusal to set aside extreme ideology and discuss any fresh ideas is not responsible

Teachers are not responsible for the "for the demise of education" in America that my opponent claims! 

Transportation should not a partisan issue. My opponent refused to collaborate on this and actively worked to undermine transportation and infrastructure projects that would maintain our roads and keep us safe. 

My opponent has received large donations from insurance companies and feels she can impose her personal, religious beliefs on her constituents.

access to healthcare is a basic right - not an opportunity to judge or condemn

Governor Inslee's moratorium is a good opportunity for us to take a step back from this process and look at the realities of the death penalty.

My opponent proposed a bill to cut the minimum wage to $6.99/hour and admitted that she proposed this bill - which would financially cripple thousands of Washingtonians - at the request of the restaurant industry,

The science is in. To debate Climate Change distracts us from actually solving it.

My opponent takes money from Big Oil which has a vested interest in denying climate change in order to prevent or stall solutions from being implemented. 

Respect is like oxygen - when it is missing, it is the only thing you can think about. If a representative is more tied to ideology than constituents,

It's difficult to find this many lies and this much rank hypocrisy in one place from one candidate at one time.

It's the typical leftist scum we've become used to since the only democrats allowed to run in the 18th are the fringe-left nutberger variety like Moeller, Cleveland, Briggs and now Bully Winningham.

One has to wonder: why are these slime reduced to a campaign of lies?  Why are they deliberately lying, exaggerating and misrepresenting the issues?

Is their reliance on the Goebbelian theory that if you have to lie often enough, long enough and loudly enough that it becomes the truth all they've got?

Bully Loserham hasn't offered a thing.  She's got no ideas, no alternatives, no nothing but to rape our wallets even more, harm the middle class even more and lie... and lie... and lie.

Vote for her?

 I'd rather vote for a box of rocks. At least they'd be honest.

Bully Loserhams reliance on lies from the C3G2 hate site?

It's no secret that the C3G2 hate site lies about their name and usually about their purpose.  As a fringe-left political hate site, that sort of thing is to be expected.

But to rely on  that one-sided garbage as a reason for anything?

Look, it's been shown that Bully is, essentially, a psychotic political liar.  She refuses to answer questions (Since she has no answers) and I do look forward to her political destruction.

Every fringe-left politician and organization in the world shows on her endorsement list, which just serves to reinforce her lack of fitness to represent the conservative 18th District... so why does she nail her own political coffin lid shut by using the lies and one-sided bullshit from the C3G2 hate group?

These same scum have no trouble whatsoever with fringe-leftist nutjobs like Bully being funded by unions or any other of the fringe-left groups out there.

If they had any concern with money in politics, they would avoid their usual hypocrisy and apply that concern to both sides... and not just the ones they hate.

But then mental cases frequently have this kind of problem... and double standard.